Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil
By: Researcher
Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).
| Authors | Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro, Matthew S. Winters |
| Journal/Conference Name | THE JOURNAL OF POLITICS |
| Paper Category | Social Sciences |
| Paper Abstract | Citizens in a democracy can only hold elected officials accountable if they are able to correctly assess politician performance. Although there is ample evidence that individuals learn and take political cues from favored sources, these sources may have incentives to dissemble. When will citizens discern between more and less credible sources of political information? We examine citizen responsiveness to information sources of variable credibility in Brazil, a setting that poses a number of challenges to citizen discernment. Using data from an original survey experiment on political corruption, we show that all respondents except for the very least educated are able to discern between sources of information with differing credibility. We also show that the ability to discern more from less credible information is increasing in cognitive and political sophistication. Our findings provide the first direct empirical evidence that citizens in a middle-income democracy are sensitive to information credibility. |
| Date of publication | 2017 |
| Code Programming Language | R |
| Comment |
Copyright Researcher 2021