Credible Sources and Sophisticated Voters: When Does New Information Induce Economic Voting?

View Researcher's Other Codes

Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).

Authors James E. Alt, David D. Lassen, John Marshall
Journal/Conference Name THE JOURNAL OF POLITICS
Paper Category
Paper Abstract When does new economic information cause voters to re-evaluate the government’s competence, and ultimately vote economically? Since politically-relevant information is often conveyed by actors with incentives to influence voter perceptions, the credibility of information sources can vary significantly. This paper randomly varies whether voters receive an aggregate unemployment forecast from the central bank, government or main opposition party using a survey experiment in Denmark with unique access to detailed panel and administrative data. We find that politically sophisticated voters discern differences in institutional credibility and the political cost of the signal, and update their unemployment expectations accordingly. Despite failing to differentiate political costs, unsophisticated voters still substantially update their expectations. However, after experimentally altering unemployment expectations, only sophisticated voters intend to engage in substantial prospective economic voting. Consequently, providing economic information supports economic voting to the extent that it is credible and reaches sophisticated voters.
Date of publication 2016
Code Programming Language R

Copyright Researcher 2022