Electoral Consequences of Colonial Invention: Brokers, Chiefs, and Distribution in Northern Ghana

View Researcher's Other Codes

Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).

Authors N. M. L. Nathan
Journal/Conference Name WORLD POLITICS
Paper Category
Paper Abstract this article studies the effects of traditional chiefs—a common type of broker—on voters’ ability to extract state resources from politicians. using original data from northern Ghana, the author shows that chieftaincy positions invented by colonial authorities are especially prone to capture, leaving voters worse off compared both to more accountable chiefs whose authority dates to the precolonial period and to voters who lack formal chiefs who can serve as brokers. the latter comparison exploits exogenous assignment of ethnic groups to the colonial invention of chieftaincy in the late nineteenth century. the findings suggest that whether voters benefit from brokers amidst clientelistic electoral competition depends on the accountability relationship between brokers and their clients.
Date of publication 2019
Code Programming Language R
Comment

Copyright Researcher 2022