moderation and competence: how a party’s ideological position shapes its valence reputation

View Researcher's Other Codes

Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).

Authors Robert Johns, Ann‐Kristin Kölln
Journal/Conference Name AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
Paper Category
Paper Abstract We combine several strands of research from electoral behaviour and party politics to suggest that ideological moderation will boost a party’s perceived competence. Less radical parties are seen as readier to compromise, more realistic about what can be achieved, and less prone to simplistic solutions. The results of conjoint experiments with party profiles show that, while an ideological leaning carries no cost, any appreciably left- or right-wing position eroded a party’s perceived competence among a representative sample of around 2,000 British citizens. This effect holds when controlling for respondents’ ideological proximity to the party in question, and looks to operate through all three of the proposed mechanisms suggested above – especially willingness to compromise. These findings have important implications both for party strategy and for voting research, highlighting a key channel through which ideological moderation yields electoral gains.
Date of publication 2019
Code Programming Language R
Comment

Copyright Researcher 2021