The effects of lawn signs on vote outcomes: Results from four randomized field experiments

View Researcher's Other Codes

Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).

Authors Donald Philip Green, Jonathan S. Krasno, Alexander Coppock, Benjamin Farrer, Brandon W. Lenoir, Joshua N. Zingher
Journal/Conference Name ELECTORAL STUDIES
Paper Category
Paper Abstract Although lawn signs rank among the most widely used campaign tactics, little scholarly attention has been paid to the question of whether they actually generate votes. Working in collaboration with a congressional candidate, a mayoral candidate, an independent expenditure campaign directed against a gubernatorial candidate, and a candidate for county commissioner, we tested the effects of lawn signs by planting them in randomly selected voting precincts. Electoral results pooled over all four studies suggest that signs increased advertising candidates’ vote shares. Results also provide some evidence that the effects of lawn signs spill over into adjacent untreated voting precincts.
Date of publication 2016
Code Programming Language R
Comment

Copyright Researcher 2022