The intrinsic value of control: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses
By: Researcher
Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).
Please contact us in case of a broken link from here
| Authors | Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez, Cass R. Sunstein, Tali Sharot |
| Journal/Conference Name | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty |
| Paper Category | Finance |
| Paper Abstract | Human beings are often faced with a pervasive problem: whether to make their own decision or to delegate the decision task to someone else. Here, we test whether people are inclined to forgo monetary rewards in order to retain agency when faced with choices that could lead to losses and gains. In a simple choice task, we show that participants choose to pay in order to control their own payoff more than they should if they were to maximize monetary rewards and minimize monetary losses. This tendency cannot be explained by participants’ overconfidence in their own ability, as their perceived ability was elicited and accounted for. Nor can the results be explained by lack of information. Rather, the results seem to reflect an intrinsic value for choice, which emerges in the domain of both gains and of losses. Moreover, our data indicate that participants are aware that they are making suboptimal choices in the normative sense, but do so anyway, presumably for psychological gains. |
| Date of publication | 2017 |
| Code Programming Language | Matlab |
| Comment |
Copyright Researcher 2021