The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations: Integrating Agency Independence and Appointee Ideology

View Researcher's Other Codes

Disclaimer: The provided code links for this paper are external links. Science Nest has no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of these links. Also, by downloading this code(s), you agree to comply with the terms of use as set out by the author(s) of the code(s).

Authors Gary E. Hollibaugh, Lawrence S. Rothenberg
Journal/Conference Name AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
Paper Category
Paper Abstract In recent years, scholars have expended considerable efforts to understand the executive appointment process and the factors influencing the choices made by the President and the Senate. However, some factors integral to theoretical models have not been well-integrated empirically, and other relevant factors have not been incorporated much at all. Here, we focus on one determinant corresponding to the former critique — nominee ideology — and another corresponding to the latter — agency independence (e.g., the degree of ex post control by elected officials). We develop several theoretically-driven hypotheses regarding who gets nominated, as well as if and when they are eventually confirmed. Results show that nominee ideology and agency independence (as well as agency ideology) matter a great deal. We show that not only does nominee ideology factor into Presidential strategic choices and Senatorial responses, but how these dynamics play out is conditioned by the type of agency and position in question.
Date of publication 2018
Code Programming Language R
Comment

Copyright Researcher 2022